CAPITOL SQUARE REVIEW AND ADVISORY BOARD, et al. v. VINCENT J. PINETTE, DONNIE A. CARR AND KNIGHTS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN
Supreme Court Cases
515 U.S. 753 (1995)
Related Cases
TOWN OF GREECE v. GALLOWAY
Decided:
GOOD NEWS CLUB, et al. v. MILFORD CENTRAL SCHOOL
Decided:
Whether a public school policy creating a limited public forum that expressly bans religious groups from school facilities constitutes viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment freedom of speech. Whether allowing the Good News Club to use school facilities for meetings would have constituted a violation of the Establishment Clause.
RONALD W. ROSENBERGER, et al. v. RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA et al.
Decided:
Whether a public university can deny funds to a religious student group that it provides to nonreligious student groups.
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS et al. v. AMOS et al.
Decided:
Whether Title VII Section 702, which provides an exemption from Title VIIs prohibition against religious discrimination for religious organizations, violates the Establishment Clause.
ESTATE OF THORNTON et al. v. CALDOR, INC.
Decided:
Whether a Connecticut statute providing Sabbath observers with an absolute and unqualified right not to work on their chosen Sabbath violated the Establishment Clause.
LARKIN et al. v. GRENDEL'S DEN, INC.
Decided:
WIDMAR et al. v. VINCENT et al.
Decided:
Whether a public university’s interest in maintaining a "strict separation of church and state" allows it to bar religious student groups from reserving facilities for worship.
NEW YORK v. CATHEDRAL ACADEMY
Decided:
EPPERSON et al. v. ARKANSAS
Decided:
ENGEL et al. v. VITALE et al.
Decided:
MCGOWAN et al. v. MARYLAND
Decided:
Whether a Maryland statute prohibiting retail on Sunday, with some exceptions for food and other things constitutes a violation of the Fourteenth and First Amendments.
BRADFIELD v. ROBERTS
Decided:
DAVIS v. BEASON
Decided:
Whether a criminal defendant's First Amendment right to freedom of association prevents the prosecution from introducing irrelevant evidence of the defendant's gang membership.