ASSOCIATED PRESS v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Supreme Court Cases
301 U.S. 103 (1937)
Related Cases
HARRIS v. QUINN
Decided:
GARY DAVENPORT, et al. v. WASHINGTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
Decided:
(1) Do labor union officials have a 1st Amendment right to seize and use for political purposes the wages of nonmembers who have chosen not to become union members? (2) Does a state campaign finance law that prohibits labor unions and their officials from seizing and using the wages of nonmembers for partisan political campaigns without obtaining the non-members' affirmative consent violate the 1st Amendment rights of labor unions?
BE & K CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al.
Decided:
Did the Court of Appeals err in holding that under Bill Johnsons Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB, 461 U.S. 731 (1983), the NLRB may, consistent with the First Amendment, impose liability on an employer for filing a losing retaliatory lawsuit, even if the employer could show the suit was not objectively baseless?
JAMES P. LEHNERT et al. v. FERRIS FACULTY ASSOCIATION et al.
Decided:
Whether a union of public employees may, consistent with the First Amendment, require non-union members covered by the collective bargaining agreement to help defray the cost of (1) lobbying activities unrelated to the collective bargaining agreement, (2) the parent union's collective bargaining costs, (3) disseminating information concerning the parent union's litigation activities, (4) public relations expenditures, (5) disseminating general information about job opportunities, professional development, and award programs, (6) sending delegates to the union's national convention, and (7) preparing for a strike that would have been illegal under state law.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CATHOLIC BISHOP OF CHICAGO et al.
Decided:
Whether exercise of jurisdiction by the NLRB to certify unions as bargaining agents for lay teachers in schools operated by schools that are "religiously associated" violates the free exercise of such schools?
ABOOD et al. v. DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION et al.
Decided:
Whether an "agency shop" arrangement, authorized by Michigan law between a local government employer and a union representing local government employees, whereby every employee represented by the union, even though not a union member, was required to pay to the union, as a condition of employment, a service fee equal in amount to union dues, violated the constitutional rights of those government employees who objected to public sector unions or to various union activities financed by the compulsory service fees.