ĂŰÖ­ĎăĚŇ

Table of Contents

Something’s fishy at Texas A&M: Administrators continue to reel in student groups’ rights with hostile Fish Camp takeover, Draggieland denial

Sunset at Texas A&M University

Texas A&M administrators have failed to explain why they are taking over a student-run orientation program and holding funds intended for LGBTQ student group. (Hussam Al-Mashhadani / Shutterstock.com)

A administrative takeover of Texas A&M University’s Fish Camp — a student-run camp for incoming Aggie freshmen — is the latest in a string of serious infringements on students’ expressive and associational rights this year. Unless TAMU changes its censorious and unconstitutional tactics, it likely won’t be the last.

Two student-run initiatives — , a student-run drag show, and the   pre-orientation program run by the same-named registered student organization — have been targeted in the last few months. And that’s after TAMU’s take-over attempt of student newspaper that we wrote about back in February. 

In terms of long-standing reputation and tradition, stacks up to The Battalion. The student-run Fish Camp orientation has annually welcomed thousands of incoming freshmen to campus for over 60 years. As with The Battalion, administrators are now trying to take over.

Denying university sponsorship to student groups or events based on viewpoint violates students’ expressive rights under the First Amendment.

TAMU has imposed several measures to wrest control of the camp from students, including not only insisting upon approval of its leadership selections, but even rewriting the camp’s values from “development, integrity, compassion, unity, continuity, outreach, and diversity” to “respect, excellence, leadership, loyalty, integrity, and selfless service.” Most recently, administrators targeted language on the camp’s website — changing “Fish Camp is a student organization” to “Fish Camp is a university extended orientation program supported by the student organization, Fish Camp” — which suggests the attempts to bring the camp under university control will not stop there. 

Draggieland, on the other hand, has faced something of the opposite from TAMU, with administrators distancing the university from the event — while the university allegedly holds onto thousands of dollars of the group’s rightfully earned money. For the past two years, the student-run drag show received sponsorship from , which provides administrative and financial support to student-organized entertainment. Yet in the fall of 2021, administrators informed students MSC Town Hall would not sponsor . This decision barred the event’s organizers from access to thousands of dollars of previous years’ profits and forced several LGBTQ student groups to band together to fundraise for the event independently.

What TAMU is doing to Fish Camp and Draggieland shares a common thread: viewpoint-based discrimination by university administrators who have provided little to no explanation for these decisions, or what interests they serve. It cannot go unnoticed, however, that this has come amid that alumni groups who have close relationships with administrators, and who claim to seek “a renewed focus on Aggie traditions and history,” have pressured TAMU to make these changes.

On April 22, we wrote TAMU asking it to explain why Draggieland lost sponsorship and to ensure that MSC Town Hall makes future sponsorship decisions fairly and without regard to groups’ or events’ viewpoints. And we wrote again yesterday, asking it to explain the burdens it has placed on Fish Camp, and demanding that administrators cease any further attempts to take over the camp. 

As we wrote in our Draggieland letter, denying university sponsorship to student groups or events based on viewpoint violates students’ expressive rights under the First Amendment. TAMU administrators have not provided a satisfactory explanation confirming that viewpoint was not a factor in the decision and affirming students’ First Amendment rights. And as we explained in our letter yesterday, hostile takeovers of student groups violate those student members’ First Amendment right to expressive association and cannot stand without a compelling university interest. 

As an institution earning ĂŰÖ­ĎăĚŇ’s highest, green light rating for written policies impacting student expression, TAMU should know better, especially after we just reminded the public university of its obligations under the First Amendment a few months ago in connection with The Battalion. 

Given the absence of a contrary explanation for the administrative decisions concerning both Draggieland and Fish Camp, TAMU students are left to assume the university is discriminating against these organizations based on their views. This practice violates the First Amendment, and we will continue to pressure TAMU administrators to meet their legal obligations in recognizing students’ most basic constitutional rights.


FIRE defends the rights of students and faculty members — no matter their views — at public and private universities and colleges in the United States. If you are a student or a faculty member facing investigation or punishment for your speech, submit your case to FIREtoday. If you’re faculty member at a public college or university, call the Faculty Legal Defense Fund 24-hour hotline at 254-500-FLDF (3533). If you’re a college journalist facing censorship or a media law question, call the Student Press Freedom Initiative 24-hour hotline at 717-734-SPFI (7734).

Recent Articles

FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share