��֭����

Last fall, the University of Virginia rightly defended a student’s right to display a sign (“Fuck UVA”) on her residence door, rejecting calls to violate her First Amendment rights. A new display has renewed that challenge to UVA’s obligations. Despite its strong track record in protecting students’ expressive rights, UVA’s housing authorities faltered, censoring student Hira Azher’s new anti-racism display.

This weekend, Azher tweeted a photo of her most recent doorway display and a letter from the university’s housing authorities directing its removal:

The unsigned letter argues that the university needed to remove the display — and that it had previously removed a “similar” display — because it “advocates physical violence” and “therefore has the potential to provoke violence,” citing the “race-based violence” in August of 2017, when a white supremacist murdered protester Heather Heyer.

The sign has , although it’s not clear by whom.

Yesterday, FIREsent a letter to UVA, explaining that the university’s assessment that the display amounts to unprotected “incitement” is erroneous. The sign’s content would be understood by observers as political rhetoric, not as a student’s literal exhortation that others burn down the building in which she resides. Even assuming it were read literally, it is not likely to actually lead anyone to burn down the University of Virginia, much less do so immediately upon reading the sign.

Others have that the university’s status as a authorizes or requires the university to remove offensive or otherwise objectionable displays. Treaties, like the UNESCO World Heritage Convention, are . It would be no small sense of irony if recognizing the legacy of Thomas Jefferson — the principal author of what became the First Amendment, and renowned for his remark that “the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants” — meant censoring student speech that echoes his refrain.

UVA has rightfully that argument, and there is no indication that it is enforcing a content-neutral time, place, and manner restriction — indeed, its statement on Azher’s previous display that students can post displays on their exterior doors. That policy has to place some limits on the size and materials used, but that amendment will presumably take effect in the fall. In any event, the university’s prohibition isn’t concerned with how the message is displayed. It’s concerned with what is displayed — and that message is protected speech.

That concern also doesn’t significantly change if she were to post that message elsewhere: incitement is unprotected whether it’s on a door, spoken through a bullhorn, or posted to social media, although that context may weigh on whether it constitutes incitement at all. But this display doesn’t meet that standard. FIREcalls on UVA to recognize as much.

FIRE defends the rights of students and faculty members — no matter their views — at public and private universities and colleges in the United States. If your rights are in jeopardy, get in touch with us: thefire.org/alarm.