Table of Contents
Possible Lawsuit at Stanford
FIRE recently learned that FIRELegal Network attorney , who successfully sued Stanford University for its speech code in 1994, has taken up the cause of preserving door-to-door distribution of student publications on Stanford’s campus. Stanford bans door-to-door distribution of literature unless hall residents specifically vote to endorse it, and the conservative Stanford Review, whose editors have long distributed their issues door-to-door, has The Stanford Progressive in objecting to the current state of affairs. Review editors have refused to abide by Stanford’s policy and are currently facing sanctions. All of this has led Corry to threatening a lawsuit unless the ban on door-to-door distribution is overturned. His reasoning, to those uninitiated in the peculiarities of California, relies upon the Golden State’s unique Leonard Law, which requires its non-religious private universities to act as if they are bound by the First Amendment.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Maine’s censure of lawmaker for post about trans student-athlete is an attack on free speech
The Maine House is wrong to censure Rep. Laurel Libby — and its actions are a clear retaliation

Trump’s border czar is wrong about AOC
AOC did nothing wrong by informing the public of their constitutional rights when encountering ICE agents

FIREcalls out 60 Minutes investigation as 'political stunt' in comment to FCC
FIREsubmitted a comment to the Federal Communications Commission about a complaint about a 60 Minutes interview with then Vice President Kamala Harris.

The National Institutes of Health shouldn’t use ÃÛÖÏãÌÒ’s College Free Speech Rankings to allocate research funding — here’s what they should do instead
NIH should give research funding to institutions that promise academic freedom to their faculty and researchers.