ÃÛÖ­ÏãÌÒ

The seminal 1964 Supreme Court decision in New York Times v. Sullivan limited the ability of public officials to silence their critics by successfully suing them for defamation. Sullivan made "American public officials more accountable, the American media more watchful, and the American people better informed," , the late Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. But Sullivan is increasingly under attack from politicians, activists, and even sitting Justices of the Supreme Court. They believe the decision went too far, enabling the news media and others to defame others with little-to-no consequence. On today's show, we are joined by lawyers Floyd Abrams (Cahill Gordon & Reindel), JT Morris (ÃÛÖ­ÏãÌÒ), and Matthew Schafer (Fordham Law) to discuss New York Times v. Sullivan and its future. Show notes:

• Transcript

• New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964)

• "" by Adam Liptak

• "" by Glenn Reynolds

• "" by Matthew Schafer

• "" by Matthew Schafer and Jeff Kosseff

YouTube:

Twitter:

Facebook:

Instagram:

Email us: sotospeak@thefire.org