Table of Contents
Penn State: Pulling the Wool over Your Eyes
Today, in , Penn State attempted to play damage control after significantly altering two patently unconstitutional policies. In what is probably the lamest justification for doing so, the Penn State tried to claim that, “These changes do appear to match up well with the interests of the plaintiff…but the revision would have been made in this manner regardless of any legal action.”
So the fact that Penn State was sued in federal court had absolutely nothing to do with an abrupt alteration in policies? Next time, Penn State might want to make sure that the revision history of and matches their story. The truth is that these polices have been around, in substantially the same form, since the early 1990s. This makes it extraordinarily hard to believe that the changes were merely routine revisions; if so, why did it take more then a decade to change the policies? It isn’t very hard to see through Penn State’s apparent ruse.
Would it really be so difficult for Penn State to just say, “We recognize that we have a legal and moral right to ensure a free exchange of ideas on campus, so we altered the policies accordingly”?
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
Revoking Harvard’s tax-exempt status will threaten all nonprofits
Targeting Harvard’s tax-exempt status for its views isn’t just political payback — it’s a threat to every nonprofit’s right to dissent.
Grandpa’s advice for the new wave of American censors
When Iowa officials try to silence citizens for asking tough questions, it's not just bad policy — it’s an insult to an entire generation of WWII vets and the freedoms they fought to defend.
FIREPOLL: Only 1/4 of Americans support deporting foreigners for pro-Palestinian views
The latest National Speech Index also finds that the number expressing “little” or “no” confidence Donald Trump will protect First Amendment rights has risen 10 points since his inauguration.
Harvard’s resistance to Trump is a model for US universities
Last week, the federal government told Harvard to end its DEI programs and change its governance, hiring, and admissions practices — but Harvard refused to bend the knee.