Table of Contents
FIREstatement on Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton that the government cannot force social media companies to distribute speech against their will. The could have major ramifications not only for social media platforms but also for other internet forums and websites that moderate their users’ speech.
The following statement can be attributed to FIREChief Counsel Robert Corn-Revere:
Today’s ruling makes clear there’s no social media exception to the First Amendment. The government has no business dictating to platforms what opinions they must host. The court rightly rejects the idea that lawmakers have more authority over speech online than they do offline. That’s a big win for free speech and a free internet.
Earlier this year, FIREfiled an amicus curiae — "friend of the court" — brief in support of NetChoice, an industry trade group for social media platforms and other internet companies, and argued that the First Amendment affords all publishers the same speech and press protections, whether they publish on a printing press, a movie screen, or an online platform. Read the amicus brief here.
For more information, please contact media@thefire.org.
Recent Articles
FIRE’s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali will not submit
Podcast
Ayaan Hirsi Ali grew up in a culture of conformity. She was beaten and mutilated. She was told who she must marry. Eventually, she rebelled. "You don't speak up at first," she told us. "First you leave and you find a place of safety. It's...
FIREstatement on congressional leaders smuggling unconstitutional Antisemitism Awareness Act into a must-pass defense bill
149 days and counting! Will the White House grant a posthumous pardon in the D.M. Bennett Case? — First Amendment News 447
