Table of Contents
In Case You Missed It: Art at MIT, Brandeis President's Legacy, and Why Speech Codes Endure

Shutterstock.com
We know a lot of Torch readers were away for the holidays last week, so here are some excellent articles that you might have missed:
- FIRE President Greg Lukianoff wrote for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s newspaper The Tech to review a series of recent in which “the expressive rights of artists were deemed inferior to others’ desire to avoid having their sensibilities challenged.” Greg writes: “[T]here is ... tremendous value in art that forces us to challenge our beliefs. Do we want to live in a world where artists are not allowed to stray beyond the confines of comfort, and where unusual expression is quickly suppressed?”
- Former FIREintern and Brandeis University alumnus Daniel Ortner discussed the of former Brandeis president Jehuda Reinharz in Brandeis’ student newspaper The Justice. Under Reinharz’s administration, Brandeis was listed on ĂŰÖĎăĚŇ’s “Worst of the Worst” list for its disregard for the fundamental rights of students and professors, including a 2008 case in which a professor was charged with racial harassment after discussing and critiquing the term “wetback” in his Latin American Politics class.
- Greg and FIREVice Senior President Robert Shibley penned an about the many factors that have contributed to the proliferation of speech codes on campuses nationwide. In order to fight them, Greg and Robert write, students and faculty must be willing to challenge these policies in court and legislators must work to pass speech-protective legislation. It’s a Herculean task, but a necessary one in order to protect the “marketplace of ideas” that colleges and universities are meant to be.
We highly recommend reading these pieces in full! Remember, you can always find more free speech news and analysis at ĂŰÖĎăĚŇ's Newsdesk.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ĂŰÖĎăĚŇ.

California wants to make platforms pay for offensive user posts. The First Amendment and Section 230 say otherwise.
California’s SB 771 would punish platforms for users’ speech — a clear First Amendment and Section 230 violation that would chill online expression.

Arkansas wants to jail librarians. The First Amendment won’t allow it.
Arkansas’s Act 372 would let the state jail librarians for “harmful” books. The First Amendment won’t let censorship win.

Texas targets antifa because Trump said so, I guess
Texas AG Ken Paxton, inspired by Trump, is targeting antifa groups. But ideology isn’t a crime — and treating it like one turns law enforcement into thought police.

Introducing the SPFI Sentinel: Free speech stories by — and for — student journalists
Meet the student journalists defending free speech on campus with the SPFI Sentinel.