��֭����

This year, FIRElaunched the Free Speech Dispatch, a regular series covering new and continuing censorship trends and challenges around the world. Our goal is to help readers better understand the global context of free expression. The previous entries covered policing of online speech, assassination attempts on U.S. soil, and more. Want to make sure you don’t miss an update? Sign up for our newsletter. 

One step forward, two steps back for Australia

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland  there was “no pathway to legislate” the government’s controversial plans to require platforms to moderate “misinformation.” In other words, the legislation is effectively dead. The bill, which I covered in a previous Dispatch, defined misinformation as “reasonably verifiable as false, misleading, or deceptive” and “likely to cause or contribute to serious harm.” There are many free speech  that arise when the government grants itself the power to require moderation of speech it deems untrue.

But while Australia’s troubling misinformation legislation failed, another worrying bill sailed forward. Late last month, Australia  the Social Media Minimum Age bill, legislation banning social media for children under the age of 16 that does not even allow for parent permission, despite the myriad threats it poses to free speech and privacy. 

Australia isn’t the only country considering measures limiting youth access to social media. Here in the United States, the  — which suffers from numerous First Amendment pitfalls — risks passage in Congress. Advocates and legislators have even pushed for  similar to Australia’s that would wholesale stop American teens from accessing social media sites.

UK adds blasphemy to its mounting free speech woes

View video

Once again, the UK is making headlines — the bad kind. The reason this time? Late last month, Member of Parliament Tahir Ali called on UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer to lead “measures to prohibit the desecration of all religious texts and the prophets of the Abrahamic religions.” 

There’s a term for that: a blasphemy law.

The UK’s relationship with free expression is currently in a free fall and the last thing it needs right now is more forms of expression to police. Blasphemy laws are often packaged and promoted in language about protecting the powerless but, as       , are regularly wielded as a tool to preserve power, whether religious, political, or somewhere in between. 

Ali’s advocacy of a blasphemy law is deeply wrong-headed, but he is far from the only one to think it might be a worthy venture. Last year, in response to a spate of Quran burning incidents, the United Nations Human Rights Council passed a  encouraging more countries to “address, prevent and prosecute acts and advocacy of religious hatred” — a nebulous concept prone to abuse — and months later, Denmark enacted such a . 

That wasn’t even the only blasphemy-related story to emerge this month out of the UK. In November, the Advertising Standards Authority  comedian Fern Brady from using an advertisement for her stand-up tour that comically depicted Brady in place of the Virgin Mary in a riff on Alonso Cano’s 17th century painting, “.” In its decision, the ASA alleged that the image could cause “serious offence” to Christians, and directed her to avoid causing insult “on the grounds of religions” again.

The latest in censorship, tech, and the internet:

• An  from Legal Initiatives for Vietnam discovered a shockingly high 90% compliance rate from companies including Meta, Google, and TikTok in response to government requests for content moderation, often of material critical of the government. Meta even utilizes a  of Vietnamese officials its users aren’t allowed to criticize. 
• Pakistan appears to be the first country to  the relatively new social media platform Bluesky, but that’s no great surprise given Pakistan’s frequent  efforts.
• A Citizen Lab  found that books “largely related to LGBTIQ, the occult, erotica, Christianity, and health and wellness” were the top items Amazon restricts shipments of to certain countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Troublingly, Amazon “uses varying error messages such as by conveying that an item is temporarily out of stock” rather than stating upfront that the books are not available due to local censorship rules.
• If you’re in Kyrgyzstan, watch what you say on the internet. In late November, the country’s parliament  a bill that will issue fines for online “insult and libel.”
• Russian communications authority Roskomnadzor is reportedly beefing up its efforts to  foreign internet access — including VPNs — in regions including Chechnya as it’s “testing its own sovereign internet it can fully control.”
• The Parliament of Malaysia  a worrying Online Safety Bill handing over to authorities broad new power to combat “harmful” content on the internet, including the ability to search and seize material from service providers without a warrant. “Freedom of speech does exist,” Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil , “but we are also given power through Parliament to impose any necessary restrictions for the safety of the public.”

South Korea’s fleeting martial law decree threatened a free speech disaster 

On Dec. 3, President Yoon Suk Yeol shocked the world by  martial law in South Korea under the guise of protecting “liberal democracy from the threat of overthrowing the regime . . . by anti-state forces active within the Republic of Korea.”

The decree , among other things, “fake news, public opinion manipulation, and false propaganda” as well as rallies and “all political activities.” All media would also be “subject to the control of the Martial Law Command.” Alleged violators of these and other provisions risked being “arrested, detained, and searched without a warrant.”

Hours later, Yoon reversed course in response to massive protests and a parliamentary veto.

Speech-related arrests and sentencing from Hong Kong to Brazil

• “Righteous people live, villains must die.” Elsa Wu, the mother of a Hong Kong activist recently sentenced to four years in prison, was arrested “on suspicion of disorderly conduct” for holding a  with this message outside of a courthouse in November.
• Indian journalist Mohammed Zubair has been  with “endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India” for criticizing, and posting video of, comments a well-known Hindu priest made about the Prophet Muhammad. “It’s a classic case of shooting the messenger,” one of Zubair’s colleagues said. “It’s a witch hunt.”
• Shortly after Zubair’s arrest, and on a similar basis, Indian police raided the offices of the Association for Protection of Civil Rights on charges including “promoting enmity.” The raid was  based on the group’s social media posts highlighting abuses against Muslims in India.
• Thai human rights lawyer Arnon Nampa, already imprisoned on similar charges, was  this month to another two years in prison “over a 2020 social media post in which he allegedly criticised the king’s authority.” In total, he will serve over 16 years in prison and is one of many Thai activists punished for insulting or criticizing the country’s monarchy. Additionally, three Thai activists were  with “contempt of court” for protesting a 2022 ruling from the Constitutional Court about the prime minister’s term limit.
• Dozens of protesters have been arrested after  against Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze’s announcement that Georgia will postpone its efforts to join the European Union until 2028.
• A Brazilian court has issued its  sentence for racism — nearly nine years in prison — over a woman’s 2017 social media video about a Malawian child adopted by two white Brazilian celebrities. The woman, Day McCarthy, called the child a “monkey” in a video and complained that “fake people and suck-ups” criticize , “who identifies as half Black,” for not having “blue eyes and straight hair and a beautiful nose” but compliment the child’s appearance. McCarthy now lives in France and it’s unclear if she will serve the sentence. 

Iran releases two dissidents but expands cruel crackdown on forced veiling critics

Last week, a wide-ranging new law went into effect that will  women who transgress Iran’s deeply oppressive mandatory hijab laws. Punishments range from flogging to long prison terms to travel bans and even death for “nudity, indecency, unveiling and bad dressing” and related crimes.

But amidst this awful development, there were some bright spots. Iranian  Atena Farghadani was released after serving eight months in prison on charges of “propaganda against the state” and dissident  Toomaj Salehi was also released after being held for 753 days over his support of women’s rights protests in the country. At one point, Salehi had been sentenced to death before the ruling was overturned by Iran’s Supreme Court.

Tiananmen joke grounds ‘Family Guy’ episode from in-flight entertainment

View video

Hong Kong airline Cathay Pacific is the latest example of a corporation eager to comply with the Chinese government’s political sensibilities after a passenger complained about an in-flight Family Guy episode that jokingly  Tank Man and the Tiananmen Square. 

“We emphasise that the content of the programme does not represent Cathay Pacific’s standpoint, and have immediately arranged to have the programme removed as soon as possible,” the airline wrote in a  earlier this month. It remains unclear what, exactly, is the company’s “standpoint” on the Tiananmen Square killings.

Mostly, but not all, bad news in arts and media:

• Bangladesh’s Press Information Department  the accreditation of 167 journalists in the country, a “broad and sweeping cancellation” that has “left the journalist community alarmed.”
• Haiti’s telecommunications authority CONATEL  evening show Radio Mega after a wanted gang leader called into the show “claiming that he was offered a large bribe by a member of the ruling Presidential Transition Council to negotiate peace with the gangs.”
• After a lengthy 14 years, broadcaster Luisito “Chito” Berjit Jr. was finally  after a Filipino court found there was insufficient evidence to find him guilty of libel over his reporting about alleged government corruption.
• A report this month from the Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute found that about two-thirds of respondents “perceived news outlets to have practiced self-censorship,” a  result since the polling began in 1997.
• French media regulatory authority Arcom reportedly  a conservative TV station €100,000 for failure to uphold its “obligation of honesty and rigour in the presentation and processing of information” after it showed an image calling abortion the world’s leading cause of death during a Catholic program.
• Kuwait has  banned the release of “Wicked” within the country “amid reports that the film includes a gay character, which led to its prohibition.” The musical joins a long list of , including “Barbie” and “Thor: Love and Thunder,” to face local bans over inclusions of LGBT themes or characters.
• Belarusian authorities  seven reporters from an online independent news outlet for “supporting extremist activities.” The president of the Belarusian Association of Journalists said it “looks like the authorities have decided to arrest all journalists they suspect of being disloyal ahead of January’s presidential vote.”
• If you expected to make it through this year without a censorship controversy from the divisive Australian Olympian break-dancer Raygun, think again. Her lawyers reportedly  legal action against the event space hosting comedian Steph Broadbridge’s show “Raygun: The Musical.” Broadbridge says Raygun’s lawyers “trademarked the poster used to advertise the musical” and “banned her from replicating the iconic kangaroo hop.”