Table of Contents
(Gasp) Conservatives on Campus Problems & Cancel Culture

As far back as when I was at Stanford Law School twenty years ago, I was taught that if you could prove someone was conservative, that was sufficiently discrediting that you didn’t have to address any of their arguments. Because conservatives bore the brunt of what would later be called “cancellations” on campus, some of the earliest takes on what would become cancel culture came from the right.
- (1987). You might not like Bloom’s prescient and challenging book about the cultural shift away from debate on moral issues, but you will be surprised by it. The title had become so well-recognized in American culture that the editors at The Atlantic decided to riff on it when they titled our article “The Coddling of the American Mind” (to my and Jon’s ). have appropriated Bloom’s book title as well.
- Charles J. Sykes (1990). A very readable record of Dartmouth’s evolution from the 1950s to 1990 that predicted how those changes might ripple outwards.
- Roger Kimball (1990; updated 2008). Kimball delivers a stinging critique of the intellectual rigor of modern humanities departments.
- and Harvey Silverglate (1998). This entry perhaps deserves an asterisk, as while Kors is a conservative, Silverglate is a liberal. Still, the first sentence in the introduction highlights the path the authors follow: “Americans think a great deal about colleges and universities, but they do not examine them very closely.”
- Heather Mac Donald (2018). Through a study of data and outcomes, Mac Donald questions whether the well-intentioned initiatives to make universities more inclusive are having the desired effects.
- Douglas Murray (2019). Murray catalogs some of the ongoing culture fights while highlighting the contradictions inherent in the arguments.
- Noah Rothman (2019). Drawing a line from identity politics on the left to the alt-right, Rothman argues that retributive identity politics undermines the intended function of the American political system.
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ֭.

California wants to make platforms pay for offensive user posts. The First Amendment and Section 230 say otherwise.
California’s SB 771 would punish platforms for users’ speech — a clear First Amendment and Section 230 violation that would chill online expression.

Arkansas wants to jail librarians. The First Amendment won’t allow it.
Arkansas’s Act 372 would let the state jail librarians for “harmful” books. The First Amendment won’t let censorship win.

Texas targets antifa because Trump said so, I guess
Texas AG Ken Paxton, inspired by Trump, is targeting antifa groups. But ideology isn’t a crime — and treating it like one turns law enforcement into thought police.

Introducing the SPFI Sentinel: Free speech stories by — and for — student journalists
Meet the student journalists defending free speech on campus with the SPFI Sentinel.