��֭����

From Buckley v. Valeo (1976) to Citizens United v. FEC (2010), legal disputes over the constitutionality of campaign finance laws have captured the public’s attention for decades.

At the heart of the debate is a question of whether money donated to political candidates or spent influencing elections is speech protected by the First Amendment. And, if it is, are there countervailing interests outweighing those core First Amendment concerns?

Even within the free speech community, the debate can be contentious. But for our guest on today’s episode of So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast, the issue is straightforward: Money spent in support of a political message is speech.

is an attorney with the , a national public-interest law firm that puts its money where its mouth is, regularly challenging campaign finance restrictions in court.

The organization most famously co-litigated the seminal (2010) case, where the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that limits on contributions to political action committees making independent expenditures are unconstitutional. It was the case that paved the way for the creation of so-called “super PACs.”

In this podcast, Gedge presents the basics of campaign finance regulation and makes his case for why money spent on politics deserves full First Amendment protection.

You can subscribe and listen to So to Speak on and , or download episodes directly from .

Stay up to date with So to Speak on the show’s and pages, and subscribe to the show’s newsletter at sotospeakpodcast.com.

Have ideas for future shows? Email us at sotospeak@thefire.org.

Have questions you want us to answer during an upcoming show? Call them into our voicemail inbox at 215-315-0100.